| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 04:05:24 +0200 From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Bugfix] sched: fix possible invalid memory access caused by CPU hot-addition On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 22:04 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:01:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:15:15 +0200 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:27:15PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: > > > > When calling kzalloc_node(size, flags, node), we should first check > > > > whether node is onlined, otherwise it may cause invalid memory access > > > > as below. > > > > > > But this is only for memory less node crap, right? > > > > um, why are memoryless nodes crap? > > Why wouldn't they be? Having CPUs with no local memory seems decidedly > suboptimal. This ain't exactly wonderful either, makes CPU domains to crawl over. node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 node 0 size: 31723 MB node 0 free: 27949 MB node 1 cpus: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 node 1 size: 32308 MB node 1 free: 31033 MB node 2 cpus: node 2 size: 32768 MB node 2 free: 16631 MB node 3 cpus: node 3 size: 32768 MB node 3 free: 32640 MB node 4 cpus: node 4 size: 32768 MB node 4 free: 32640 MB node 5 cpus: node 5 size: 32768 MB node 5 free: 32638 MB node distances: node 0 1 2 3 4 5 0: 10 12 12 15 12 15 1: 12 10 15 12 15 15 2: 12 15 10 12 15 15 3: 15 12 12 10 15 12 4: 12 15 15 15 10 12 5: 15 15 15 12 12 10 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists