[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53572939.7020509@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:45:13 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugfix] sched: fix possible invalid memory access caused by
CPU hot-addition
Hi Peter,
It's not for memoryless node, but to solve a race window
in CPU hot-addition. The related CPU hot-addition flow is:
1) Handle CPU hot-addition event
1.a) gather platform specific information
1.b) associate hot-added CPU with a node
1.c) create CPU device
2) User online hot-added CPUs through sysfs:
2.a) cpu_up()
2.b) ->try_online_node()
2.c) ->hotadd_new_pgdat()
2.d) ->node_set_online()
So between 1.b and 2.c, kmalloc_node(nid) may cause invalid
memory access without the node_online(nid) check.
Best Regards!
Gerry
On 2014/4/22 16:15, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:27:15PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> When calling kzalloc_node(size, flags, node), we should first check
>> whether node is onlined, otherwise it may cause invalid memory access
>> as below.
>
> But this is only for memory less node crap, right?
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists