linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:21:22 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	"Pinski, Andrew" <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com>,
	Chung-Lin Tang <cltang@...esourcery.com>
CC:	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Catalin.Marinas@....com" <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] nios2 Linux kernel port

I think Linuxs said we should just fix POSIX on that front.

On April 23, 2014 11:15:34 AM PDT, "Pinski, Andrew" <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 23, 2014, at 10:59 AM, "Chung-Lin Tang"
><cltang@...esourcery.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2014/4/22 07:20 PM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday 22 April 2014 18:37:11 Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Arnd and Peter Anvin,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Other than 64-bit time_t, clock_t and suseconds_t, can you
>confirm
>>>>>>> that we don't need to have 64 bit off_t? See detail in link
>below.
>>>>>>> I can submit the patches for 64-bit time changes
>>>>>>> (include/asm-generic/posix_types.h and other archs) if everyone
>is
>>>>>>> agreed on this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes.
>>> Okay, will doing that.
>> 
>> I believe that arm64 ILP32 will also be affected. What is the status
>of
>> this configuration? Has the glibc/kernel ABI been finalized?
>
>Not yet.  I am still working out the signal handling part. But we
>already agreed on 64bit time_t, clock_t, and suseconds_t.  And we
>agreed to a 64bit offset_t too. 
>
>On a related note suseconds in the timespec in posix is defined to be
>long. So it would nice if the kernel ignores the upper 32bits so we
>(glibc developers) can fix this for new targets including x32 and
>arm64/ilp32. 
>
>Thanks,
>Andrew
>
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Chung-Lin
>> 

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/