[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+TP2=iVYj=a6YGiGdOUqznb1MxdLLz5tjL8Hwwcq2K0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:43:15 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kaslr should avoid setup_data region
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hello Kees
>
> I'm worrying that setup_data regions could be overwitten by randomize
> kernel base. Would you like to fix it in kaslr code?
>
> One problem is there could be a lot of setup_data regions but current
> mem_avoid is an fixed array.
Sure, can you give me some examples? Seems like it shouldn't be too
hard to have the mem_avoid logic walk additional areas.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists