[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140424025016.GB2180@darkstar.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:50:16 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kaslr should avoid setup_data region
On 04/23/14 at 07:43pm, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Hello Kees
> >
> > I'm worrying that setup_data regions could be overwitten by randomize
> > kernel base. Would you like to fix it in kaslr code?
> >
> > One problem is there could be a lot of setup_data regions but current
> > mem_avoid is an fixed array.
>
> Sure, can you give me some examples? Seems like it shouldn't be too
> hard to have the mem_avoid logic walk additional areas.
Great, To walk through the list just like the function parse_setup_data in
arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
Thanks
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists