linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: clk-7xx: Correct ABE DPLL configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:03:59 +0300
From:	Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
To:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: clk-7xx: Correct ABE DPLL configuration

On 04/24/2014 12:11 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Mike, Tero,
>
> On 04/03/2014 09:29 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> On 04/02/2014 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>>> On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>>> ABE DPLL frequency need to be lowered from 361267200
>>>> to 180633600 to facilitate the ATL requironments.
>>>> The dpll_abe_m2x2_ck clock need to be set to double
>>>> of ABE DPLL rate in order to have correct clocks
>>>> for audio.
>>>
>>> Do you have some sort of TRM reference for this?
>>
>> The ATL's max divider is 32.
>> For audio purpose the clock coming out from the ATL instance should be
>> 128 * fs. It is only possible to have 44.1KHz sampling rate with ABE DPLL set
>> to 361267200 or 180633600. Which means:
>> The atl generated clock should be 128 * 44100 = 5644800
>>  From ABE_DPLL 361267200 we would need to have 64 as divider (ATL can't do this).
>>  From the suggested ABE_DPLL of 180633600 we can use ATL divider of 32, which
>> is the maximum it can do.
>>
>> So the reason for the change is to have ATLPCLK clock which can be used for
>> audio in the future, the 361267200 is just too high.
>
> Tero: can I have your ack for this patch or do you have further concerns?

Yea looks good to me, except for the fact that there is some work on 
getting default rate/parent support through DT. I would like a comment 
from Mike about the estimate when this can get in, and whether we should 
merge intermediate solutions still like this.

Anyway, you can consider this patch acked by me, I'll let Mike to decide 
what to do with it though.

-Tero

> Mike: do you want me to resend this patch?
>
> Thanks,
> Péter
>
>>
>>>
>>> -Tero
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>>    1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c
>>>> index f7e40734c819..19a55bf407dd 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c
>>>> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
>>>>    #include <linux/clkdev.h>
>>>>    #include <linux/clk/ti.h>
>>>>
>>>> -#define DRA7_DPLL_ABE_DEFFREQ                361267200
>>>> +#define DRA7_DPLL_ABE_DEFFREQ                180633600
>>>>    #define DRA7_DPLL_GMAC_DEFFREQ                1000000000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> @@ -322,6 +322,11 @@ int __init dra7xx_dt_clk_init(void)
>>>>        if (rc)
>>>>            pr_err("%s: failed to configure ABE DPLL!\n", __func__);
>>>>
>>>> +    dpll_ck = clk_get_sys(NULL, "dpll_abe_m2x2_ck");
>>>> +    rc = clk_set_rate(dpll_ck, DRA7_DPLL_ABE_DEFFREQ * 2);
>>>> +    if (rc)
>>>> +        pr_err("%s: failed to configure ABE DPLL m2x2!\n", __func__);
>>>> +
>>>>        dpll_ck = clk_get_sys(NULL, "dpll_gmac_ck");
>>>>        rc = clk_set_rate(dpll_ck, DRA7_DPLL_GMAC_DEFFREQ);
>>>>        if (rc)
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/