linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 1/9] extcon: Add extcon_dev_allocate/free() to control the memory of extcon device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:03:44 -0500
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
CC:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"myungjoo.ham@...sung.com" <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	<gg@...mlogic.co.uk>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
	<ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/9] extcon: Add extcon_dev_allocate/free() to control
 the memory of extcon device

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:58:29PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> >> +void extcon_dev_free(struct extcon_dev *edev)
> >> +{
> >> +     if (edev)
> >> +             kfree(edev);
> >
> > kfree(NULL) is safe
> 
> I don't understand about meaning 'kfree(NULL)'.
> Why do I free 'NULL' pointer' instead of 'edev' pointer?

you don't need to check if evdev is valid before calling kfree() on it
because if it happens to be NULL, no cute bunnies will be sacrificed.

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)