[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53592D04.4040001@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:25:56 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To: "Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>
CC: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] pinctrl: add Intel BayTrail GPIO/pinctrl support
On 04/24/2014 06:58 AM, Westerberg, Mika wrote:
>> >No, that's my point. I was expecting the pinmux functions of the
>> >pinctrl driver are used by ACPI, but apparently they aren't, and
>> >that's why I'm asking.
> Which functions?
The functions in struct pinmux_ops, like get_function_groups. Will
these functions ever be called on an ACPI system?
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists