linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] pinctrl: add Intel BayTrail GPIO/pinctrl support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:41:57 +0300
From:	"Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@...el.com>
To:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linus <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] pinctrl: add Intel BayTrail GPIO/pinctrl support

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25:56AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 04/24/2014 06:58 AM, Westerberg, Mika wrote:
> >>>No, that's my point.  I was expecting the pinmux functions of the
> >>>pinctrl driver are used by ACPI, but apparently they aren't, and
> >>>that's why I'm asking.
> 
> >Which functions?
> 
> The functions in struct pinmux_ops, like get_function_groups.  Will
> these functions ever be called on an ACPI system?

Well, if you have an ACPI system (like normal PC) it is perfectly fine to
have pin controller/mux hardware there which is not dependent at all on
ACPI.

If you happen to have pin controller/mux driver that drives that hardware,
I'm sure your pinmux functions gets called.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/