[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140424162029.GV11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 18:20:29 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
efault@....de, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mgorman@...e.de
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V5 0/8] remove cpu_load idx
OK, this series is a lot saner, with the exception of 3/8 and
dependents.
I do still worry a bit for loosing the longer term view for the big
domains though. Sadly I don't have any really big machines.
I think the entire series is equivalent to setting LB_BIAS to false. So
I suppose we could do that for a while and if nobody reports horrible
things we could just do this.
Anybody?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists