[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140425215509.GD18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 22:55:09 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@...sung.com>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel panic at Ubuntu: IMA + Apparmor
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:43:42PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> ssize_t __vfs_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *pos)
> {
> ssize_t ret;
>
> if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
> return -EBADF;
> if (!file->f_op->read && !file->f_op->aio_read)
> return -EINVAL;
> if (unlikely(!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, buf, count)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> if (ret >= 0) {
> count = ret;
> if (file->f_op->read)
> ret = file->f_op->read(file, buf, count, pos);
> else
> ret = do_sync_read(file, buf, count, pos);
> }
>
> return ret;
> }
... which lacks the f_pos wraparound, etc. checks done by rw_verify_area().
IOW, it's one more place to grep through while verifying that ->read()
et.al. do not get called with such arguments.
fanotify probably could be skipped - ask the security circus crowd about
that one, it's their bast^Wbaby. add_rchar() and inc_syscr()... depends on
whether you want those reads hidden from accounting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists