[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <535B0393.1080300@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:53:39 -0700
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Courtney Cavin <courtney.cavin@...ymobile.com>
CC: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: pm8x41: add support for Qualcomm 8x41 PMICs
On 4/25/2014 5:40 PM, Courtney Cavin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 02:28:06AM +0200, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 4/23/2014 6:19 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> [...]
>>>> +static int pm8x41_probe(struct spmi_device *sdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct regmap *regmap;
>>>> +
>>>> + regmap = devm_regmap_init_spmi_ext(sdev, &pm8x41_regmap_config);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
>>>> + dev_dbg(&sdev->dev, "regmap creation failed.\n");
>>>> + return PTR_ERR(regmap);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return of_platform_populate(sdev->dev.of_node, NULL, NULL, &sdev->dev);
>>>
>>> I think that this will not going to work. For example in this particular
>>> case, both controllers have "qcom,qpnp-revid" peripheral which is
>>> located at offset 0x100.
>>>
>>> And the result is:
>>>
>>> [ 0.963944] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/bus/platform/devices/100.revid'
>>
>> The duplicate filename error is because pm8x41_probe() is calling of_platform_populate()
>> directly.
>>
>> If that call is removed then there is no attempt to create a revid file in
>> /sys/bus/platform/devices. If I add your pm8841@4 node to my dts file, then
>> the 100.revid file is properly created at
>>
>> /sys/firmware/devicetree/base/soc/qcom,spmi@...cf000/pm8841@...com,revid@100
>>
>> and no attempt is made to create /sys/bus/platform/devices/100.revid
>>
>> This appears to be correct to me, because I do not think revid should be created as
>> a platform device.
>>
>
> Wait, what? That's the entire point of this driver.
>
> [...]
>>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Remove of_platform_populate() from pm8x41_probe(). Do you know of any
>> other reason it can not be removed?
>
> I do! If you remove it, the entire driver becomes a useless pile of
> nothing!
>
> The PMICs targeted by this driver are mostly made up of independent
> blocks which should be able to be written as standalone device drivers.
> The design of this driver is to create a simple bus-like layer between
> SPMI and these independent blocks. of_platform_populate() is what makes
> it work.
>
> -Courtney
>
Hmmmm, yet another device tree conceptual thing for me to grok. I'll go
off and see if a bus-like layer can exist without being a platform device.
-Frank
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists