linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/19] softirq: A single rcu_bh

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1398729392-15087-19-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:56:32 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/19] softirq: A single rcu_bh_qs() call per softirq set is enough

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

Calling rcu_bh_qs() after every softirq action is not really needed.
What RCU needs is at least one rcu_bh_qs() per softirq round to note a
quiescent state was passed for rcu_bh.

Note for Paul and myself : this could be inlined as a single instruction
and avoid smp_processor_id()
(sone this_cpu_write(rcu_bh_data.passed_quiesce, 1))

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/softirq.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index b50990a5bea0..b9b2d4906848 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -232,7 +232,6 @@ asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
 	bool in_hardirq;
 	__u32 pending;
 	int softirq_bit;
-	int cpu;
 
 	/*
 	 * Mask out PF_MEMALLOC s current task context is borrowed for the
@@ -247,7 +246,6 @@ asmlinkage void __do_softirq(void)
 	__local_bh_disable_ip(_RET_IP_, SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
 	in_hardirq = lockdep_softirq_start();
 
-	cpu = smp_processor_id();
 restart:
 	/* Reset the pending bitmask before enabling irqs */
 	set_softirq_pending(0);
@@ -276,11 +274,11 @@ restart:
 			       prev_count, preempt_count());
 			preempt_count_set(prev_count);
 		}
-		rcu_bh_qs(cpu);
 		h++;
 		pending >>= softirq_bit;
 	}
 
+	rcu_bh_qs(smp_processor_id());
 	local_irq_disable();
 
 	pending = local_softirq_pending();
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/