linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/19] rcu: Replace __this_cpu_ptr() uses with raw_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:56:31 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, sbw@....edu, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/19] rcu: Replace __this_cpu_ptr() uses with raw_cpu_ptr()

From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>

__this_cpu_ptr is being phased out.

One special case is increment_cpu_stall_ticks().
A per cpu variable is incremented so use raw_cpu_inc().

Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 6 +++---
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index ecd7e046de76..d3e023e24c6f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2008,7 +2008,7 @@ rcu_send_cbs_to_orphanage(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp,
 static void rcu_adopt_orphan_cbs(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	int i;
-	struct rcu_data *rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
 
 	/* No-CBs CPUs are handled specially. */
 	if (rcu_nocb_adopt_orphan_cbs(rsp, rdp, flags))
@@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@ __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool needwake;
-	struct rcu_data *rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->beenonline == 0);
 
@@ -3066,7 +3066,7 @@ static void rcu_barrier_callback(struct rcu_head *rhp)
 static void rcu_barrier_func(void *type)
 {
 	struct rcu_state *rsp = type;
-	struct rcu_data *rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
 
 	_rcu_barrier_trace(rsp, "IRQ", -1, rsp->n_barrier_done);
 	atomic_inc(&rsp->barrier_cpu_count);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index f7593c2536b0..2e579c38bd91 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -1809,7 +1809,7 @@ static void rcu_oom_notify_cpu(void *unused)
 	struct rcu_data *rdp;
 
 	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
-		rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
+		rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
 		if (rdp->qlen_lazy != 0) {
 			atomic_inc(&oom_callback_count);
 			rsp->call(&rdp->oom_head, rcu_oom_callback);
@@ -1951,7 +1951,7 @@ static void increment_cpu_stall_ticks(void)
 	struct rcu_state *rsp;
 
 	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp)
-		__this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda)->ticks_this_gp++;
+		raw_cpu_inc(rsp->rda->ticks_this_gp);
 }
 
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO */
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/