linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: Use list_for_each_entry_reverse instead of list_for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOh2x=nzLNDe+vL5UvKkaRMDT7M+U9jG4HLHavS2ksmiOE_G+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:02:56 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: Use list_for_each_entry_reverse instead of list_for_each_entry

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
> Most of the cpufreq table is sorted in descending order.

Which part of kernel says that?

> But when cpufreq table is made from dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table,
> it is sorted in ascending order. So in some case to make cpufreq table
> with descending order it needs an extra work.

Order of this table shouldn't matter at all in cpufreq layer..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/