[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <535FB969.5080503@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 07:38:33 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
CC: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"msalter@...hat.com" <msalter@...hat.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"roy.franz@...aro.org" <roy.franz@...aro.org>,
"ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: UEFI support
On 04/29/2014 06:47 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> Waiting for the tip/x86/efi to be merged first is not a problem. We
> also need a stable base for testing the arm64 UEFI series, so I assume
> this series can be based onto tip/x86/efi (would such branch be rebased
> before hitting mainline?).
>
> Given that Leif's series contains both generic efi and arm64 patches,
> what's your preference for merging them? I'm happy to add my ack and
> they go via your tree (or the other way around).
>
tip:x86/efi will not be rebased (barring major unforseen events).
I'm not opposed to pushing the arm64 patches through -tip (via Matt), if
it works with your workflow, either. Perhaps we need to rename the
branch to tip:core/efi...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists