linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: UEFI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140429144713.GL26088@console-pimps.org>
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:47:13 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"msalter@...hat.com" <msalter@...hat.com>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"roy.franz@...aro.org" <roy.franz@...aro.org>,
	"ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: UEFI support

On Tue, 29 Apr, at 02:47:28PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> 
> Waiting for the tip/x86/efi to be merged first is not a problem. We
> also need a stable base for testing the arm64 UEFI series, so I assume
> this series can be based onto tip/x86/efi (would such branch be rebased
> before hitting mainline?).
 
tip/x86/efi is unlikely to be rebased. Certainly with dependencies like
this there would have to be a really good reason to rebase it.

> Given that Leif's series contains both generic efi and arm64 patches,
> what's your preference for merging them? I'm happy to add my ack and
> they go via your tree (or the other way around).

I'm happy either way, though if I take them through my tree (and
subsequently through tip) you won't have to worry about the merge window
rigmarole, which is a plus.

So, eveyone happy for me to take these with Catalin's Acked-by?

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/