[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1404291921490.6261@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:22:25 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] timer: prevent overflow in apply_slack
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Jiri Bohac wrote:
> Thomas, does this make sense now, with the new description?
Yep, except
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 05:23:11PM +0200, Jiri Bohac wrote:
> > On architectures with sizeof(int) < sizeof (long), the
> > computation of mask inside apply_slack() can be undefined if the
> > computed bit is > 32.
> >
> > E.g. with: expires = 0xffffe6f5 and slack = 25, we get:
> >
> > expires_limit = 0x20000000e
> > bit = 33
> > mask = (1 << 33) - 1 /* undefined */
> >
> > On x86, mask becomes 1 and and the slack is not applied properly.
> > On s390, mask is -1, expires is set to 0 and the timer fires immediately.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
> > Suggested-by: Deborah Townsend <dstownse@...ibm.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
> > index 87bd529..4c36c91 100644
> > --- a/kernel/timer.c
> > +++ b/kernel/timer.c
> > @@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ unsigned long apply_slack(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires)
> >
> > bit = find_last_bit(&mask, BITS_PER_LONG);
> >
> > - mask = (1 << bit) - 1;
> > + mask = (1LL << bit) - 1;
This should be 1UL, shouldn't it?
> > expires_limit = expires_limit & ~(mask);
> >
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
> SUSE Labs, SUSE CZ
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists