[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140430093345.GA18623@midget.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:33:45 +0200
From: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] timer: prevent overflow in apply_slack
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 07:22:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > + mask = (1LL << bit) - 1;
>
> This should be 1UL, shouldn't it?
yes, good catch, thanks!
On architectures with sizeof(int) < sizeof (long), the
computation of mask inside apply_slack() can be undefined if the
computed bit is > 32.
E.g. with: expires = 0xffffe6f5 and slack = 25, we get:
expires_limit = 0x20000000e
bit = 33
mask = (1 << 33) - 1 /* undefined */
On x86, mask becomes 1 and and the slack is not applied properly.
On s390, mask is -1, expires is set to 0 and the timer fires immediately.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
Suggested-by: Deborah Townsend <dstownse@...ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index 87bd529..4c36c91 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ unsigned long apply_slack(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires)
bit = find_last_bit(&mask, BITS_PER_LONG);
- mask = (1 << bit) - 1;
+ mask = (1UL << bit) - 1;
expires_limit = expires_limit & ~(mask);
--
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, SUSE CZ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists