lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140430055503.GD4774@dhcp-16-105.nay.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:55:03 +0800
From:	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	rjw@...ysocki.net, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com, vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: [Patch v2] lapic need be checked if available when initialize acpi
 processor id

In acpi_processor_get_info(), acpi processor info is initialized including
id, namely cpu index. Currently, if on UP system running SMP kerenl with
no LAPIC in MADT, cpu0_initialized is checked if acpi processor id is
initialized.

However this check maybe is not correct for kdump kernel. Most of time
only 1 CPU is supported because of known problems. So in 1st kernel
multiple CPUs are present, then crash happened in one specific CPU,
say 2nd CPU. Then it jump into kdump kernel with "nr_cpus=1" specified
in cmdline. In this situation, since kdump kernel is warm reset, it will
reuse the ACPI resource passed from crashed kernel directly, namely 1st
kernel. It means in MADT all LAPIC is enabled while only 1 CPU is
present in running system. The kdump kernel usually is the same as the
crashed 1st kernel. So now in kdump kernel, x86_cpu_to_apicid stored the
apicid and its related cpu id. If only check cpu0_initialized, it will
assign 0 to the acpi processor id of 1st CPU, it's not correct.

So in this patch, check acpi_lapic too. If acpi_lapic is 0, then LAPIC in
MADT is not available, assigne 0 to the handling acpi processor. If
acpi_lapic is 1, then LAPIC in MADT is available, let's get apic processor
id from x86_cpu_to_apicid.

Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index c29c2c3..33f934d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
 	pr->apic_id = apic_id;
 
 	cpu_index = acpi_map_cpuid(pr->apic_id, pr->acpi_id);
-	if (!cpu0_initialized) {
+	if (!cpu0_initialized && !acpi_lapic) {
 		cpu0_initialized = 1;
 		/* Handle UP system running SMP kernel, with no LAPIC in MADT */
 		if ((cpu_index == -1) && (num_online_cpus() == 1))
-- 
1.8.5.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ