linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Make exynos machine

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK9yfHxfkegFzzJCz4nAkxrHT6FGT0OQ-5RkCdTA3ruo2kU8CA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2014 11:30:59 +0530
From:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
To:	Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>, chow.kim@...sung.com,
	Young-Gun Jang <yg1004.jang@...sung.com>,
	VIKAS SAJJANC <vikas.sajjan@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] ARM: EXYNOS: Make exynos machine_ops as static

Hi Pankaj,

On 30 April 2014 10:47, Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com> wrote:
> As machine function ops are used only in this file let's make
> them static.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> index 3d69e8d..06dcce5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5_iodesc[] __initdata = {
>         },
>  };
>
> -void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
> +static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
>  {
>         struct device_node *np;
>         u32 val = 0x1;
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
>         platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
>  }
>
> -void __init exynos_init_late(void)
> +static void __init exynos_init_late(void)
>  {
>         if (of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440"))
>                 /* to be supported later */
> @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static void __init exynos_map_io(void)
>                 iotable_init(exynos5250_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_iodesc));
>  }
>
> -void __init exynos_init_io(void)
> +static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
>  {
>         debug_ll_io_init();


The declarations from common.h should also be removed in this patch to
avoid the below
build errors:

arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:198:13: error: static declaration of
‘exynos_restart’ follows non-static declaration
 static void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd)
             ^
In file included from arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:31:0:
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h:22:6: note: previous declaration of
‘exynos_restart’ was here
 void exynos_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd);
      ^
arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:235:20: error: static declaration of
‘exynos_init_late’ follows non-static declaration
 static void __init exynos_init_late(void)
                    ^
In file included from arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:31:0:
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h:25:6: note: previous declaration of
‘exynos_init_late’ was here
 void exynos_init_late(void);
      ^
arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:296:20: error: static declaration of
‘exynos_init_io’ follows non-static declaration
 static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
                    ^
In file included from arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c:31:0:
arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h:21:6: note: previous declaration of
‘exynos_init_io’ was here
 void exynos_init_io(void);


-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/