[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140502164305.GA18747@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 09:43:05 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] percpu_ida: Take into account CPU topology when
stealing tags
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:41:40AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > At least for SCSI devices _tag space_ is plenty, it's just the we
> > artifically limit our tag space to the queue depth to avoid having to
> > track that one separately. In addition we also preallocaste a request
> > for each tag, so even if we would track the queue depth separately
> > we would waste a lot of memory.
>
> In practice it comes out to the same, it's not feasible to run a much
> larger space and track on queue depth. So I don't think that changes the
> conclusion for SCSI.
Agreed. Just had to check if my smart ass hat still fits this morning..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists