[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5363CE30.9060102@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 10:56:16 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] percpu_ida: Take into account CPU topology when
stealing tags
On 05/02/2014 10:43 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 10:41:40AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> At least for SCSI devices _tag space_ is plenty, it's just the we
>>> artifically limit our tag space to the queue depth to avoid having to
>>> track that one separately. In addition we also preallocaste a request
>>> for each tag, so even if we would track the queue depth separately
>>> we would waste a lot of memory.
>>
>> In practice it comes out to the same, it's not feasible to run a much
>> larger space and track on queue depth. So I don't think that changes the
>> conclusion for SCSI.
>
> Agreed. Just had to check if my smart ass hat still fits this morning..
If not, these are on sale
http://www.cafepress.com/+smartass_trucker_hat,18823771
:-)
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists