[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140506062710.GB25208@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 08:27:10 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Mathieu Souchaud <mattieu.souchaud@...e.fr>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling
* Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
> +err_device_create:
> + /*
> + * mce_device_remove behave properly if mce_device_create was not
> + * called on that device.
> + */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> + mce_device_remove(i);
>
> grammar comment "s/behave/behaves/"
>
> Though perhaps this is better:
>
> /*
> * We didn't keep track of which devices were created above, but
> * even if we had, the set of online cpus might have changed.
> * Play safe and remove for every possible cpu since mce_device_remove()
> * will do the right thing.
> */
and I guess:
s/cpu since/cpu, since/
?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists