[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2103538240.232636551.1399455232411.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 11:33:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: mattieu.souchaud@...e.fr
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: bp@...en8.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling
Ok, thanks, that's better. I'll put your modifications in the patch v3.
----- Mail original -----
De: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>
À: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: "Mathieu Souchaud" <mattieu.souchaud@...e.fr>, bp@...en8.de, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Envoyé: Mardi 6 Mai 2014 08:27:10
Objet: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mce: Improve mcheck_init_device() error handling
* Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
> +err_device_create:
> + /*
> + * mce_device_remove behave properly if mce_device_create was not
> + * called on that device.
> + */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> + mce_device_remove(i);
>
> grammar comment "s/behave/behaves/"
>
> Though perhaps this is better:
>
> /*
> * We didn't keep track of which devices were created above, but
> * even if we had, the set of online cpus might have changed.
> * Play safe and remove for every possible cpu since mce_device_remove()
> * will do the right thing.
> */
and I guess:
s/cpu since/cpu, since/
?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists