linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/86] 3.10.39-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140506002824.GA7006@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 May 2014 17:28:24 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, satoru.takeuchi@...il.com,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/86] 3.10.39-stable review

On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 05:09:27PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 05/05/2014 01:43 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 11:15:44AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On 05/04/2014 08:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.39 release.
> >>> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >>> let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Responses should be made by Tue May  6 15:41:13 UTC 2014.
> >>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I am still seeing build failures, even with x86_64 (both allmodconfig and
> >> allyesconfig fail).
> >> 	total: 127 pass: 113 skipped: 4 fail: 10
> >>
> >> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c: In function 'musb_stage0_irq':
> >> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:673:26: error: 'struct musb' has no member named 'hcd'
> >>
> >> Problem is due to 'usb: musb: avoid NULL pointer dereference'.
> >> A brief glance into the code suggests that the patch will require an explicit
> >> back-port to 3.10.
> >
> > Thanks, I've now dropped that one.
> >
> 
> Looks like you added it back in. The build with the dropped patch was fine.
> I'll send another note after the rebuild with the patch added back in is complete.

I added back the "fixed" one, hopefully it really is :)

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/