linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/86] 3.10.39-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5368378E.2040403@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Mon, 05 May 2014 18:14:54 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, satoru.takeuchi@...il.com,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/86] 3.10.39-stable review

On 05/05/2014 05:28 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 05:09:27PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 05/05/2014 01:43 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 11:15:44AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On 05/04/2014 08:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.39 release.
>>>>> There are 86 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Responses should be made by Tue May  6 15:41:13 UTC 2014.
>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am still seeing build failures, even with x86_64 (both allmodconfig and
>>>> allyesconfig fail).
>>>> 	total: 127 pass: 113 skipped: 4 fail: 10
>>>>
>>>> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c: In function 'musb_stage0_irq':
>>>> drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c:673:26: error: 'struct musb' has no member named 'hcd'
>>>>
>>>> Problem is due to 'usb: musb: avoid NULL pointer dereference'.
>>>> A brief glance into the code suggests that the patch will require an explicit
>>>> back-port to 3.10.
>>>
>>> Thanks, I've now dropped that one.
>>>
>>
>> Looks like you added it back in. The build with the dropped patch was fine.
>> I'll send another note after the rebuild with the patch added back in is complete.
>
> I added back the "fixed" one, hopefully it really is :)
>

Yes. Final build results:
	total: 127 pass: 122 skipped: 4 fail: 1

[ unicore32:defconfig is the failing build ]

Guenter




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/