lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6994558.Q3OYh8PWMa@wuerfel>
Date:	Wed, 07 May 2014 09:55:16 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] sh/PCI: Pass GAPSPCI_DMA_BASE CPU address to dma_declare_coherent_memory()

On Tuesday 06 May 2014 16:48:33 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> @@ -51,8 +53,12 @@ static void gapspci_fixup_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
>                 /*
>                  * Redirect dma memory allocations to special memory window.
>                  */
> +               region.start = GAPSPCI_DMA_BASE;
> +               region.end = GAPSPCI_DMA_BASE + GAPSPCI_DMA_SIZE - 1;
> +               res.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> +               pcibios_bus_to_resource(dev->bus, &res, &region);
>                 BUG_ON(!dma_declare_coherent_memory(&dev->dev,
> -                                               GAPSPCI_DMA_BASE,
> +                                               res->start,
>                                                 GAPSPCI_DMA_BASE,
>                                                 GAPSPCI_DMA_SIZE,
>                                                 DMA_MEMORY_MAP |

Not sure if this is an improvement. I understand the intention, but
it's actually possible for the offset to be different both ways:

Your patch applies the outbound mem_offset that was provided when
registering the MMIO resource for the PCI host bridge. What the driver
needs instead is the inbound DMA offset that gets applied by some
host bridges that don't have a 1:1 mapping but also don't have an
IOMMU. We know that on this particular platform, both are zero, so
the original code works and it will keep working with your change,
but I think it's a mistake anyway. I have seen both kinds of offsets
in the past on real machines, but I am not aware of any where they
are both nonzero and have the same value.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ