[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <536A56E4.5020909@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 11:53:08 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: blk-mq: WARN at block/blk-mq.c:585 __blk_mq_run_hw_queue
On 05/07/2014 11:45 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 05/07/2014 09:37 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> While fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools guest running the latest -next
>> kernel I've stumbled on the following spew:
>>
>> [ 986.962569] WARNING: CPU: 41 PID: 41607 at block/blk-mq.c:585 __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x90/0x500()
>
> I'm going to need more info than this. What were you running? How as kvm
> invoked (nr cpus)?
Sure!
It's running in a KVM tools guest (not qemu), with the following options:
'--rng --balloon -m 28000 -c 48 -p "numa=fake=32 init=/virt/init zcache ftrace_dump_on_oops debugpat kvm.mmu_audit=1 slub_debug=FZPU rcutorture.rcutorture_runnable=0 loop.max_loop=64 zram.num_devices=4 rcutorture.nreaders=8 oops=panic nr_hugepages=1000 numa_balancing=enable'.
So basically 48 vcpus (the host has 128 physical ones), and ~28G of RAM.
I've been running trinity as a fuzzer, which doesn't handle logging too well,
so I can't reproduce it's actions easily.
There was an additional stress of hotplugging CPUs and memory during this recent
fuzzing run, so it's fair to suspect that this happened as a result of that.
Anything else that might be helpful?
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists