[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ha50cuab.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 15:46:36 +0300
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/11] perf: Allow for multiple ring buffers per event
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:34:17PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
>>
>> > So the aux_head/tail values should also be in the file space and not
>> > start at 0 again, similar for the offsets in the AUX record.
>>
>> Thinking some more about it: if we keep aux_{offset,size} in userpg,
>> then it would make sense to have aux_{head,tail} run from 0 to infinity
>> similar to data_{head,tail}, especially considering that neither data_*
>> nor aux_* pointers are file offsets anyway.
>
> Yeah, this might make it easier. So then the rule is *_offset +
> *_{head,tail} is the actual file offset into the buffer.
You mean *_offset + (*_{head,tail} % *_size) ?
Regards,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists