[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140508152614.GC30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 17:26:14 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng081251@...il.com>
Cc: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] treewide: remove all open implementation of
nice_to_rlimit()/rlimit_to_nice().
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 10:51:13PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> Just want to avoid using hardcoding of 20. If no, there is no meaning we
> collect
> priority related information into prio.h. And convertion between nice
> value [-20,19]
> and rlimit style value [0,40] is used by several callers currently.
>
Yeah, not really a comment on your patch, just a general observation on
the thing you touched :-)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists