linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] treewide: remove all open implementation of nice_to_rlimit()/rlimit_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <536C1CD8.2030602@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 9 May 2014 09:10:00 +0900
From:	Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng081251@...il.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] treewide: remove all open implementation of nice_to_rlimit()/rlimit_to_nice().

On 05/09/2014 12:26 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 10:51:13PM +0800, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
>> Just want to avoid using hardcoding of 20. If no, there is no meaning we
>> collect
>> priority related information into prio.h.  And convertion between nice
>> value [-20,19]
>> and rlimit style value [0,40] is used by several callers currently.
>>
> Yeah, not really a comment on your patch, just a general observation on
> the thing you touched :-)

Ha, okey, thanx for your reply. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/