[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdb6wh9ah7ivNvU44j79LqFEVv-keAVxK8jO7h5LJsP5zg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 13:46:08 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Alan Tull <atull@...era.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7 v2] gpio: dwapb: use a second irq chip
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Right new have one irq chip running always in level mode. It would nicer
> to have two irq chips where one is handling level type interrupts and
> the other one is doing edge interrupts. So we can have at runtime two users
> where one is using edge and the other level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> ---
> I am very sorry for the delay. I assumed that I've already fixed the
> patch sent it out. Just realized that it was not the case.
>
> v1…v2:
> - using the lopp again but breaking the assignment of type and
> handler out of the loop as suggested by delicious quinoa.
Can I have an ACK from Jamie &&|| Alan on this patch so I can apply
it?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists