[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomDmCtrEuq2o8CYto7_bo+zAgyo99LntX8PY1tKhwcbig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 12:37:27 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tick: SHUTDOWN event-dev if no events are required
for KTIME_MAX
On 10 May 2014 16:31, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> There is even a better way to do that:
>
> 1) Create a new callback set_state() which has an
> int return value.
>
> 2) Make the callsites do
>
> if (dev->set_state) {
> ret = dev->set_state();
> handle_return_value();
> } else
> dev->set_mode();
Do you want me to touch clock_event_mode as well?
Otherwise we will pass mode into a function setting state..
Or we can do s/mode/state after all the work suggested by you
is done ..
Or leave as is..
1 & 2, should be just 1-2 patches, I will try to send them as soon
as possible. Once these get your nod, will start working on fixing
all the clockevent drivers.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists