[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405120937350.6261@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 09:39:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
cc: Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tick: SHUTDOWN event-dev if no events are required
for KTIME_MAX
On Mon, 12 May 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10 May 2014 16:31, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > There is even a better way to do that:
> >
> > 1) Create a new callback set_state() which has an
> > int return value.
> >
> > 2) Make the callsites do
> >
> > if (dev->set_state) {
> > ret = dev->set_state();
> > handle_return_value();
> > } else
> > dev->set_mode();
>
> Do you want me to touch clock_event_mode as well?
> Otherwise we will pass mode into a function setting state..
>
> Or we can do s/mode/state after all the work suggested by you
> is done ..
>
> Or leave as is..
You can name the new callback set_dev_mode() :)
set_state() was just pulled out of the air for illustration.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists