[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0910DD04CBD6DE4193FCF86B9C00BE97210369@BPXM01GP.gisp.nec.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 06:21:12 +0000
From: Atsushi Kumagai <kumagai-atsushi@....nes.nec.co.jp>
To: "sdu.liu@...wei.com" <sdu.liu@...wei.com>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: "will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"wangnan0@...wei.com" <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
"peifeiyue@...wei.com" <peifeiyue@...wei.com>,
"liusdu@....com" <liusdu@....com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 2/2] makedumpfile: get additional information from
vmcore
Hello Liu,
>Now we define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS and SECTION_SIZE_BITS as
>macros. So if we deal with vmcores with different values
>of these two macros. We have to recompile makedumpfile.
There are other macros which have architecture-specific values
(e.g. __PAGE_OFFSET), and some functions are specific to each
architecture (e.g. vaddr_to_paddr()), so we need recompilation
eventually.
OTOH, we already don't need recompilation for the same architecture
since the values of such macros are defined for each kernel version
like below:
#ifdef __x86_64__
...
#define _MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS_ORIG (40)
#define _MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS_2_6_26 (44)
#define _MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS_2_6_31 (46)
So I don't think this patch is valuable.
Thanks
Atsushi Kumagai
>This patch makes makedumpfile get these two values from
>vmcore info, if existing. It makes the makedumpfile more
>compatible to vmcores with different section size.
>
>Signed-off-by: Liu Hua <sdu.liu@...wei.com>
>---
> makedumpfile.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> makedumpfile.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
>index 6cf6e24..3cdf323 100644
>--- a/makedumpfile.c
>+++ b/makedumpfile.c
>@@ -2111,6 +2111,8 @@ read_vmcoreinfo(void)
> READ_NUMBER("PG_slab", PG_slab);
> READ_NUMBER("PG_buddy", PG_buddy);
> READ_NUMBER("PG_hwpoison", PG_hwpoison);
>+ READ_NUMBER("SECTION_SIZE_BITS", SECTION_SIZE_BITS);
>+ READ_NUMBER("MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS", MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS);
>
> READ_SRCFILE("pud_t", pud_t);
>
>@@ -2998,6 +3000,18 @@ initialize_bitmap_memory(void)
> }
>
> int
>+calibrate_machdep_info(void)
>+{
>+ if (NUMBER(MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) > 0)
>+ info->max_physmem_bits = NUMBER(MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS);
>+
>+ if (NUMBER(SECTION_SIZE_BITS) > 0)
>+ info->section_size_bits = NUMBER(SECTION_SIZE_BITS);
>+
>+ return TRUE;
>+}
>+
>+int
> initial(void)
> {
> off_t offset;
>@@ -3214,6 +3228,9 @@ out:
> if (debug_info && !get_machdep_info())
> return FALSE;
>
>+ if (debug_info && !calibrate_machdep_info())
>+ return FALSE;
>+
> if (is_xen_memory() && !get_dom0_mapnr())
> return FALSE;
>
>diff --git a/makedumpfile.h b/makedumpfile.h
>index eb03688..7acb23a 100644
>--- a/makedumpfile.h
>+++ b/makedumpfile.h
>@@ -1434,6 +1434,8 @@ struct number_table {
> long PG_hwpoison;
>
> long PAGE_BUDDY_MAPCOUNT_VALUE;
>+ long SECTION_SIZE_BITS;
>+ long MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS;
> };
>
> struct srcfile_table {
>--
>1.9.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists