[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5371C8E6.6080700@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 15:25:26 +0800
From: Liu hua <sdu.liu@...wei.com>
To: Atsushi Kumagai <kumagai-atsushi@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: "will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"wangnan0@...wei.com" <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
"peifeiyue@...wei.com" <peifeiyue@...wei.com>,
"liusdu@....com" <liusdu@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] makedumpfile: get additional information from
vmcore
On 2014/5/13 14:21, Atsushi Kumagai wrote:
> Hello Liu,
>
>> Now we define MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS and SECTION_SIZE_BITS as
>> macros. So if we deal with vmcores with different values
>> of these two macros. We have to recompile makedumpfile.
>
> There are other macros which have architecture-specific values
> (e.g. __PAGE_OFFSET), and some functions are specific to each
> architecture (e.g. vaddr_to_paddr()), so we need recompilation
> eventually.
>
> OTOH, we already don't need recompilation for the same architecture
> since the values of such macros are defined for each kernel version
> like below:
>
> #ifdef __x86_64__
> ...
> #define _MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS_ORIG (40)
> #define _MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS_2_6_26 (44)
> #define _MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS_2_6_31 (46)
>
> So I don't think this patch is valuable.
Hi Atsushi,
For x86, it is not necessory. But for arm, different venders
may define different SECTION_SIZE_BITS. for example:
1 arch/arm/mach-clps711x/include/mach/memory.h
#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 24
2 arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/memory.h
#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 28
4 arch/arm/mach-hisi/include/mach/memory.h
#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 26
8 arch/arm/mach-sa1100/include/mach/memory.h
#define SECTION_SIZE_BITS 27
Perhaps we should find another way to let the userspace tools
to get the architecture-specific values.
Liu Hua
>
>
> Thanks
> Atsushi Kumagai
>
>> This patch makes makedumpfile get these two values from
>> vmcore info, if existing. It makes the makedumpfile more
>> compatible to vmcores with different section size.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Hua <sdu.liu@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> makedumpfile.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>> makedumpfile.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
>> index 6cf6e24..3cdf323 100644
>> --- a/makedumpfile.c
>> +++ b/makedumpfile.c
>> @@ -2111,6 +2111,8 @@ read_vmcoreinfo(void)
>> READ_NUMBER("PG_slab", PG_slab);
>> READ_NUMBER("PG_buddy", PG_buddy);
>> READ_NUMBER("PG_hwpoison", PG_hwpoison);
>> + READ_NUMBER("SECTION_SIZE_BITS", SECTION_SIZE_BITS);
>> + READ_NUMBER("MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS", MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS);
>>
>> READ_SRCFILE("pud_t", pud_t);
>>
>> @@ -2998,6 +3000,18 @@ initialize_bitmap_memory(void)
>> }
>>
>> int
>> +calibrate_machdep_info(void)
>> +{
>> + if (NUMBER(MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) > 0)
>> + info->max_physmem_bits = NUMBER(MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS);
>> +
>> + if (NUMBER(SECTION_SIZE_BITS) > 0)
>> + info->section_size_bits = NUMBER(SECTION_SIZE_BITS);
>> +
>> + return TRUE;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int
>> initial(void)
>> {
>> off_t offset;
>> @@ -3214,6 +3228,9 @@ out:
>> if (debug_info && !get_machdep_info())
>> return FALSE;
>>
>> + if (debug_info && !calibrate_machdep_info())
>> + return FALSE;
>> +
>> if (is_xen_memory() && !get_dom0_mapnr())
>> return FALSE;
>>
>> diff --git a/makedumpfile.h b/makedumpfile.h
>> index eb03688..7acb23a 100644
>> --- a/makedumpfile.h
>> +++ b/makedumpfile.h
>> @@ -1434,6 +1434,8 @@ struct number_table {
>> long PG_hwpoison;
>>
>> long PAGE_BUDDY_MAPCOUNT_VALUE;
>> + long SECTION_SIZE_BITS;
>> + long MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS;
>> };
>>
>> struct srcfile_table {
>> --
>> 1.9.0
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists