[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5371D8B5.3070701@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 09:32:53 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Do not zero sg->cpumask and sg->sgp->power in
build_sched_groups
Hi Peter,
On 30/04/14 14:39, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> From: Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@....com>
>
> There is no need to zero struct sched_group member cpumask and struct
> sched_group_power member power since both structures are already allocated
> as zeroed memory in __sdt_alloc().
>
> This patch has been tested with
> BUG_ON(!cpumask_empty(sched_group_cpus(sg))); and BUG_ON(sg->sgp->power);
> in build_sched_groups() on ARM TC2 and INTEL i5 M520 platform including
> CPU hotplug scenarios.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 9cae286824bb..6bc51aebbf1b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -5807,8 +5807,6 @@ build_sched_groups(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> continue;
>
> group = get_group(i, sdd, &sg);
> - cpumask_clear(sched_group_cpus(sg));
> - sg->sgp->power = 0;
> cpumask_setall(sched_group_mask(sg));
>
> for_each_cpu(j, span) {
>
I think this one slipped through the cracks. Could you have a look?
Thanks,
-- Dietmar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists