[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANk1AXQTy_qtOzXmp_NJ7aoRfAdmCDavDrYhp4KdPKkmJ8zCCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 11:17:35 -0500
From: Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Alan Tull <atull@...era.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7 v2] gpio: dwapb: use a second irq chip
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
>> Right new have one irq chip running always in level mode. It would nicer
>> to have two irq chips where one is handling level type interrupts and
>> the other one is doing edge interrupts. So we can have at runtime two users
>> where one is using edge and the other level.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
>> ---
>> I am very sorry for the delay. I assumed that I've already fixed the
>> patch sent it out. Just realized that it was not the case.
>>
>> v1…v2:
>> - using the lopp again but breaking the assignment of type and
>> handler out of the loop as suggested by delicious quinoa.
>
> Can I have an ACK from Jamie &&|| Alan on this patch so I can apply
> it?
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
Yes
Acked-by: Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists