linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Clean up DMA API docs and dma_addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <537390BE.3010307@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 14 May 2014 08:50:22 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Clean up DMA API docs and dma_addr_t usage

On 05/14/2014 03:23 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:48:47PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> Maybe the third time's a charm :)
>>
>> This cleans up some DMA-API documentation and makes a minor no-op change to
>> the dma_declare_coherent_memory() prototype.
>>
>> Changes from v2:
>>   - Added description of CPU virtual/physical and bus addresses in
>>     DMA-API-HOWTO
>>   - Added comments to sh/PCI (Dreamcast) update
>>   - Dropped IOMMU interface dma_addr_t changes
>>
>> I didn't add Arnd's and Greg's acks to patch 1 because of all the new
>> address description text I added.
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Bjorn Helgaas (4):
>>       DMA-API: Clarify physical/bus address distinction
>>       DMA-API: Change dma_declare_coherent_memory() CPU address to phys_addr_t
>>       sh/PCI: Pass GAPSPCI_DMA_BASE CPU & bus address to dma_declare_coherent_memory()
>>       iommu/exynos: Remove unnecessary "&" from function pointers
> 
> Applied patches 1-3 to my core branch and patch 4 to the arm/exynos
> branch. Patch 3 doesn't really belong into my tree, please let me know
> if there are any objections against it being there and I'll drop it.

I was thinking that either Bjorn or I should merge patches 1 and 2.

-- 
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/