[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140514102307.GD6026@8bytes.org>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 12:23:07 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Clean up DMA API docs and dma_addr_t usage
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:48:47PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Maybe the third time's a charm :)
>
> This cleans up some DMA-API documentation and makes a minor no-op change to
> the dma_declare_coherent_memory() prototype.
>
> Changes from v2:
> - Added description of CPU virtual/physical and bus addresses in
> DMA-API-HOWTO
> - Added comments to sh/PCI (Dreamcast) update
> - Dropped IOMMU interface dma_addr_t changes
>
> I didn't add Arnd's and Greg's acks to patch 1 because of all the new
> address description text I added.
>
> ---
>
> Bjorn Helgaas (4):
> DMA-API: Clarify physical/bus address distinction
> DMA-API: Change dma_declare_coherent_memory() CPU address to phys_addr_t
> sh/PCI: Pass GAPSPCI_DMA_BASE CPU & bus address to dma_declare_coherent_memory()
> iommu/exynos: Remove unnecessary "&" from function pointers
Applied patches 1-3 to my core branch and patch 4 to the arm/exynos
branch. Patch 3 doesn't really belong into my tree, please let me know
if there are any objections against it being there and I'll drop it.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists