[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMEtUuyHO-MGzL6nrLShG1UHTzb=HXTAPV5trv1SHL6TV0bMYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 20:26:10 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] tracing: accelerate tracing filters with BPF
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2014 19:55:11 -0700
> Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
>
>> --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig
>> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ config FTRACE_NMI_ENTER
>> default y
>>
>> config EVENT_TRACING
>> + depends on NET
>> select CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER
>> bool
>>
>
> This part makes me a little nervous. I know a lot of embedded devices
> depend on tracing, but do they all have network?
I think we may want to split BPF into its own config, since it doesn't
really depend on anything in net.
> They may, but I would like to hear from others in the embedded space.
>
> -- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists