[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5372E2A8.6070903@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 11:27:36 +0800
From: Michael wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [ISSUE] sched/cgroup: Does cpu-cgroup still works fine nowadays?
On 05/13/2014 10:23 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[snip]
>
> The point remains though, don't use massive and awkward software stacks
> that are impossible to operate.
>
> I you want to investigate !spinners, replace the ABC with slightly more
> complex loads like: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/18/212
That's what we need, may be a little reform to enable multi-threads, or
may be add some locks... anyway, will redo the test and see what we
could found :)
Regards,
Michael Wang
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists