[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140515185635.617d372b@linux.lan.towertech.it>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 18:56:35 +0200
From: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
To: RAGHAVENDRA GANIGA <ravi23ganiga@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: query regarding not returning error if request_irq fails after
rtc registration
On Thu, 15 May 2014 22:15:14 +0530
RAGHAVENDRA GANIGA <ravi23ganiga@...il.com> wrote:
> my question is that the set_alarm and alarm_irq_enable is still active,
> so should i use some flag in the global private variable of the driver
> so that if the request irq fails, then using this flag the set_alarm
> and alarm_irq_enable can return error since there is no irq handler
> for the rtc interrupt
> or is there any other solution
> or let the set_alarm and alarm_irq_enable routine be as it is and will
you can use a flag (or set the irq to -1)
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists