[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140515183919.GC11650@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 12:39:19 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Strashko, Grygorii" <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar@...com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] pci: keystone: add pcie driver based on
designware core driver
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:13PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:45:08 Murali Karicheri wrote:
> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_KEYSTONE
> > >> +/*
> > >> + * The KeyStone PCIe controller has maximum read request size of 256 bytes.
> > >> + */
> > >> +static void quirk_limit_readrequest(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > >> +{
> > >> + int readrq = pcie_get_readrq(dev);
> > >> +
> > >> + if (readrq > 256)
> > >> + pcie_set_readrq(dev, 256);
> > >> +}
> > >> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_limit_readrequest);
> > >> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_KEYSTONE */
> > > This doesn't work: you can't just limit do this for all devices just based
> > > on PCI_KEYSTONE being enabled, you have to check if you are actually using
> > > this controller.
> > >
> > > Arnd
> > I assume, I need to check if PCI controller's vendor ID/ device ID
> > match with the keystone
> > PCI controller's ID and call pcie_set_readrq() for all of the slave
> > PCI devices and do this fixup.
> > Is this correct understanding? If you can point me to an example code
> > for this that will be
> > really helpful so that I can avoid re-inventing the wheel.
>
> I think it would be best to move the quirk into the keystone pci driver
> and compare compare the dev->driver pointer of the PCI controller device.
The PCI core handles setting the maximum read request size already,
can you figure out why the core code isn't doing what you need and
correct the root problem?
I'm guessing the values in the root port bridge config space are not
correct or something like that??
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists