[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53751DDF.40304@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 16:04:47 -0400
From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Strashko, Grygorii" <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar@...com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] pci: keystone: add pcie driver based on designware
core driver
On 5/15/2014 2:39 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:20:13PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Thursday 15 May 2014 13:45:08 Murali Karicheri wrote:
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_KEYSTONE
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * The KeyStone PCIe controller has maximum read request size of 256 bytes.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static void quirk_limit_readrequest(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + int readrq = pcie_get_readrq(dev);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (readrq > 256)
>>>>> + pcie_set_readrq(dev, 256);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, quirk_limit_readrequest);
>>>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_KEYSTONE */
>>>> This doesn't work: you can't just limit do this for all devices just based
>>>> on PCI_KEYSTONE being enabled, you have to check if you are actually using
>>>> this controller.
>>>>
>>>> Arnd
>>> I assume, I need to check if PCI controller's vendor ID/ device ID
>>> match with the keystone
>>> PCI controller's ID and call pcie_set_readrq() for all of the slave
>>> PCI devices and do this fixup.
>>> Is this correct understanding? If you can point me to an example code
>>> for this that will be
>>> really helpful so that I can avoid re-inventing the wheel.
>> I think it would be best to move the quirk into the keystone pci driver
>> and compare compare the dev->driver pointer of the PCI controller device.
> The PCI core handles setting the maximum read request size already,
> can you figure out why the core code isn't doing what you need and
> correct the root problem?
>
> I'm guessing the values in the root port bridge config space are not
> correct or something like that??
>
> Jason
What you mean by "The PCI core handles setting the maximum read request
size already"
I see there is function pcie_write_mrrs() in the drivers/pci/probe.c
that reads the mps
using pcie_get_mps() and then set mrrs to mps. But this function is
called only from
pcie_bus_configure_set() that is called by pcie_bus_configure_settings()
pcie_bus_configure_settings() is called by
0 pci-common.c pcibios_scan_phb 1676
pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
1 pci_gx.c fixup_read_and_payload_sizes 606
pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
2 acpi.c pci_acpi_scan_root 556
pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
3 pcihp_slot.c pci_configure_slot 164
pcie_bus_configure_settings(dev->bus);
None of them gets called on ARM platform.
What is needed for Keystone PCI is that we need to limit mrrs to 256
bytes for all
of the downstream devices that talks to PCIe controller. This needs to
be enforced
through a quirk. Or Is there something missing that Keystone or DW
driver is not
making use of that reads the mrrs value of the RC and set the same on
all of the
downstream devices connected to the bus that the controller is connected to?
Murali
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists