[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53751062.2050401@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 13:07:14 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, lizefan@...wei.com
CC: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
ARM kernel mailing list
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] cgroup: use cgroup->self.refcnt for cgroup refcnting
On 05/09/2014 03:13 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Currently cgroup implements refcnting separately using atomic_t
> cgroup->refcnt. The destruction paths of cgroup and css are rather
> complex and bear a lot of similiarities including the use of RCU and
> bouncing to a work item.
>
> This patch makes cgroup use the refcnt of self css for refcnting
> instead of using its own. This makes cgroup refcnting use css's
> percpu refcnt and share the destruction mechanism.
>...
In next-20150515, this patch causes silent boot failures on NVIDIA Tegra
ARM systems. There isn't even any earlyprintk. Reverting this one patch
solves this.
I was a bit surprised that cgroups would cause such an issue, but
looking at a normal kernel boot, I guess cgroup does get initialized
very early:
Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel.
[ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
[ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
[ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
Anyway, I'll try to track down what the problem is, but if someone
familiar with this patch could give it a look, that'd be very useful,
since I'm not at all familiar with this code or feature.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists