[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1405150106410.30079@vincent-weaver-1.umelst.maine.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 01:07:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [perf] yet another 32/64-bit range check failure
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > Something like so should do I suppose.
> >
> > ---
> > Subject: perf: Fix perf_event_open(.flags) test
> >
> > Vince noticed that we test the (unsigned long) flags field against an
> > (unsigned int) constant. This would allow setting the high bits on 64bit
> > platforms and not get an error.
> >
> > There is nothing that uses the high bits, so it should be entirely
> > harmless, but we don't want userspace to accidentally set them anyway,
> > so fix the constants.
> >
> > Reported-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Tested-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
>
> Your patch fixes the problem, or at least the test I wrote to check the
> issue now fails properly.
Even though this isn't as pressing an issue as the other perf_event
problems, I wanted to make sure this patch didn't get forgotten...
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists