lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 16 May 2014 16:05:34 +0800
From:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, sfi-devel@...plefirmware.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [RFC Patch Part1 V1 14/30] x86, ioapic: use irq_cfg() instead of irq_get_chip_data() for better readability

Use defined helper function irq_cfg() instead of irq_get_chip_data() for
better readability.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c |   20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index 86f9511c97a0..8d6e4c7e7011 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ int __init arch_early_irq_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned int irq)
+static inline struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg(unsigned int irq)
 {
 	return irq_get_chip_data(irq);
 }
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static struct irq_cfg *alloc_irq_and_cfg_at(unsigned int at, int node)
 	if (res < 0) {
 		if (res != -EEXIST)
 			return NULL;
-		cfg = irq_get_chip_data(at);
+		cfg = irq_cfg(at);
 		if (cfg)
 			return cfg;
 	}
@@ -1219,7 +1219,7 @@ void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu)
 	raw_spin_lock(&vector_lock);
 	/* Mark the inuse vectors */
 	for_each_active_irq(irq) {
-		cfg = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+		cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
 		if (!cfg)
 			continue;
 
@@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ __apicdebuginit(void) print_IO_APICs(void)
 		if (chip != &ioapic_chip)
 			continue;
 
-		cfg = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+		cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
 		if (!cfg)
 			continue;
 		entry = cfg->irq_2_pin;
@@ -2268,7 +2268,7 @@ static void irq_complete_move(struct irq_cfg *cfg)
 
 void irq_force_complete_move(int irq)
 {
-	struct irq_cfg *cfg = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	struct irq_cfg *cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
 
 	if (!cfg)
 		return;
@@ -2541,7 +2541,7 @@ static inline void init_IO_APIC_traps(void)
 	 * 0x80, because int 0x80 is hm, kind of importantish. ;)
 	 */
 	for_each_active_irq(irq) {
-		cfg = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+		cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
 		if (IO_APIC_IRQ(irq) && cfg && !cfg->vector) {
 			/*
 			 * Hmm.. We don't have an entry for this,
@@ -2674,7 +2674,7 @@ early_param("disable_timer_pin_1", disable_timer_pin_setup);
  */
 static inline void __init check_timer(void)
 {
-	struct irq_cfg *cfg = irq_get_chip_data(0);
+	struct irq_cfg *cfg = irq_cfg(0);
 	int node = cpu_to_node(0);
 	int apic1, pin1, apic2, pin2;
 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -2981,7 +2981,7 @@ int create_irq(void)
 
 void destroy_irq(unsigned int irq)
 {
-	struct irq_cfg *cfg = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
+	struct irq_cfg *cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 	irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOREQUEST|IRQ_NOPROBE);
@@ -3117,7 +3117,7 @@ int setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *msidesc,
 	if (!irq_offset)
 		write_msi_msg(irq, &msg);
 
-	setup_remapped_irq(irq, irq_get_chip_data(irq), chip);
+	setup_remapped_irq(irq, irq_cfg(irq), chip);
 
 	irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(irq, chip, handle_edge_irq, "edge");
 
@@ -3255,7 +3255,7 @@ int default_setup_hpet_msi(unsigned int irq, unsigned int id)
 
 	hpet_msi_write(irq_get_handler_data(irq), &msg);
 	irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT);
-	setup_remapped_irq(irq, irq_get_chip_data(irq), chip);
+	setup_remapped_irq(irq, irq_cfg(irq), chip);
 
 	irq_set_chip_and_handler_name(irq, chip, handle_edge_irq, "edge");
 	return 0;
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ