linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 RFC 0/6] KVM: s390: cpu model implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 May 2014 16:49:11 +0200
From:	Michael Mueller <mimu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:	qemu-devel@...gnu.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Andreas Faerber <afaerber@...e.de>,
	"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 RFC 0/6] KVM: s390: cpu model implementation

On Fri, 16 May 2014 13:32:09 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com> wrote:

> On 13/05/14 16:58, Michael Mueller wrote:
> > The proposed patch set implements S390 cpu model support in kvm. A cpu
> > model is defined by a triple comprizing the cpu type , the cpu facility
> > set and instruction blocking control. A consumer requests a feasible
> > combination of that that triple before vcpu creation. All subsequently
> > created vcpu's will use this cpu configuration. 
> > 
> > Michael Mueller (6):
> >   s390/sclp: add sclp_get_ibc function
> >   KVM: s390: split SIE state guest prefix field
> >   KVM: s390: use facilities and cpu_id per KVM
> >   KVM: s390: add ibc api
> >   KVM: s390: initial implementation of soft facilities
> >   KVM: s390: add cpu model support
> > 
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  13 +-
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/sclp.h     |   1 +
> >  arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |  23 ++++
> >  arch/s390/kvm/Makefile           |   2 +-
> >  arch/s390/kvm/diag.c             |   2 +-
> >  arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c          |   4 +-
> >  arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.h          |   8 +-
> >  arch/s390/kvm/ibc.c              |  29 +++++
> >  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         | 263 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h         |  43 ++++++-
> >  arch/s390/kvm/priv.c             |  16 ++-
> >  arch/s390/kvm/softfac.c          |  38 ++++++
> >  drivers/s390/char/sclp_early.c   |  12 +-
> >  13 files changed, 397 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/s390/kvm/ibc.c
> >  create mode 100644 arch/s390/kvm/softfac.c
> > 
> 
> I will add patch 1 and 2 to the next KVM: s390: pull request as there 
> does not seem to be potential for discussion / interface changes. 
> Everything else looks ok, but I want to wait if additional feedback 
> about the overall design comes in. 

Perfect...

> 
> Christian

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/